ci: +61 2 9320 9646
www.arup.com

Connect with Amp on Linkedln
Follow Ng... 11011pm

From: Angelica GIANNOULATOU <angelica.giannoulatou@moreaukusunoki.com>

Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2020 5:26 AM

To: Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Cc: Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; simon.walkom@maas.museum; Lisa Havilah <Lisa.Havilahmaas.museum>; Nicolas Moreau <nicolas.moreau@moreaukusunoki.com>; hiroko kusunoki <hiroko.kusunoki@moreaukusunoki.com>; Leigh Woodley <leigh.woodley@genton.com.au>; Agnieszka PRUSIK <agnieszka.prusik@moreaukusunoki.com>; Steven Toia <Steven.Toia@genton.com.au>; Enrico Zara <Enrico.Zara@arup.com>; Eric Rivers

<Eric.Rivers Eve Hoskins <Eve.Hoskins art_Qip_c)^-n>; Alexander Hespe <alexander.hespe@arup.com>; Alex Bowen <Alex.Bowenmaas.museum>; Chaya Bratoeva <chaya.bratoeva@maas.museum>; Lisa Ffrench <Lisa.Ffrench@maas.museum>; Hayley Coombes <Hayley.Coombes@maas.museum>; James Rongen-Hall <James.Rongen-Hall@maas.museum>; Haico Schepers <Haico.Schepers@arup.com>

Subject: [External] Re: Powerhouse Parramatta - Design Meeting Agenda

Hello all,

Please find a link to all the booklets we discussed today.
https://we.tl/t-LK9MrIX4hi

Cementitious Facade Panels

- Any feedback/markup from the Arup team is more than welcome, to help us understand the

advantages or constraints of these different options.

- Initial approximate dimensions on the joints will also help us better test the visual impact.

- We will continue this study and do some tests with bigger panels (we understand that Arup will also provide a comparison for standard vs custom sized panels)

Exo-Facade Offset Impact

- We have added to the hybrid studies, to test the 0.75m offset

- We will follow up with some views to try and visualise the impact of the different options on the Civic Link.

Best regards,

Angelica GIANNOULATOU

MOREAU
KUSUNOKI
ARCHITECTES

5 rue de Nemours
75011 Paris France

T: 01 84 16 46 87

Le mer. 29 avr. 2020 a 06:00, Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au> a ecrit : Hi All

Ahead of this evenings Design meeting please find the attached agenda to guide discussions. Please also find attached:

· SSDA Elevational markup

sure they are preparing something in line with your design.

Based on your booklet, I can see that there are 3 types of facades system for the cementitious panels that I have pulled out information on and put into the following document. We have provided the size considerations and limitations for these.

https://arup-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/p/eve hoskins/EU9Nu-sg30tFsONVB82-
obQBfzYFZ4MfJolo2i7mXudSZo?e=S87ubV

https://arup-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/p/eve hoskins/EbaFxWvW7PNJuEp97TeZnIEBhR6u4-OnzuAk--3LhO5ng?e=kTu7QY

1. Precast (your reference to steel reinforced panels) — You have mentioned load bearing and non-loadbearing facade precast panels. We have discussed load bearing panels previously with structures but as it does not benefit their structural system, we have not explored this further. You have also mentioned precast sandwich panels which include a layer of insulation to the panel itself. We should note that the insulation that is required in these panels is not compliant with current BCA with regards to non-combustibility and will require a fire engineered solution to go down this route.

2. Curtain wall with GRC panels — we have used glass reinforced concrete in this study as it is readily available in Australia. Note that for the 2m spacing and for the same curtain wall system to be adopted throughout the whole project, a 150mm deep mullion at all locations would be beneficial to allow for sufficient thermal insulation within the panel and sufficient structural support for the heavier cementitious panels. This may also allow the same curtain wall (with stiffening) to work at areas where there are no internal structure required i.e areas with floor to floor <4.5m.

3. Hook on GRC panels (Stick system)

It is our understanding that the Powerhouse prefers the 2m spacings of the facade modulation. We note that while we would prefer 1.5m modulation for ease of installation, it is not impossible and we can engineering custom lightweight GRC panels to suit, with stiffeners in high wind areas.

Note that for the 2m spacing the same T section (or box section) can be used for structural support of the glazed facade as there is a reduction factor for the support of these larger panels. This bespoke T section (or box section) can be replaced with an off the shelf section in the Solid wall areas where the structure will need to be covered with internal linings.

With regards to the gap of the cementitious facade in response to the seismic structural movements, we will hopefully be able to get you a rough indication of this tomorrow. This is very dependent on structural movements and facade supports so will be a rough estimate until there is a more final structural movements report.

Kind Regards,

Eve Hoskins

Engineer I Facade Engineering

BEHons / BDesArch

Arup

Barrack Place 151 Clarence Street Sydney NSW 2000

Eve Hoskins

Engineer I Facade Engineering

BEIions 7 BDcsArch

Amp

Barrack Place 151 Clarence Street Sydney NSW 2000

3: +61 2 9320 9646

www.arup.com

Connect with Amp on Linkedln
Follow @ArupGroup

From: Angelica GIANNOULATOU <angelica.giannoulatou@moreaukusunoki.com>

Sent: Monday, 4 May 2020 10:18 PM

To: Eve Hoskins <Eve.Hoskins@arup.com>

Cc: Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Nicolas Moreau <nicolas.moreau@moreaukusunoki.com>; hiroko kusunoki <hiroko.kusunoki@moreaukusunoki.com>; Leigh Woodley <leigh.woodley@genton.com.au>, Agnieszka PRUSIK <agnieszka.prusik@moreaukusunoki.com>; Steven Toia <Steven.Toia@genton.com.au>, Enrico Zara <Enrico.Zara@arup.com>; Jacob Wiest <jacob.wiest@arup.com>; Peter Romeos <Peter.Romeos@arup.com>; George Cunha <George.Cunha@arup.com>

Subject: Re: [External] Re: Powerhouse Parramatta - Design Meeting Agenda

Thank you very much, Eve.

We will review your documents and take them into account in our studies.

We are also happy to discuss the samples tomorrow, so that we can provide some clarity on the

direction.

Best regards,

Angeta GIANNOULATOU

MOREAU

KUSUNOKI
ARCHITECTES

5 rue de Nemours
75011 Paris France

T : 01 84 16 46 87

Le lun. 4 mai 2020 a 09:44, Eve Hoskins <Eve.Hoskins@arup.com> a ecrit :

Hi Angelica (you emailed me just as I was emailing you),

Thanks for your booklet, That is useful to see the options that you are looking into.

Speaking to colleagues we are not familiar with an Australian supplier of the Hering internal products that you are showing in your booklet. We predict that these products will need to come from Germany. Australia has a relatively large market of Precast and GRC manufacturers so we have included these in the attached booklet. Suppliers we have been speaking to are: Precast concrete, Reider (Australian distributor is DCA Facades), Ascuro and Shapeshift. Some suppliers have offered to mock up samples based on the infonriation I have given them on the quartz based look with lighter colour pipTient to the concrete. Maybe we can discuss this quickly tomorrow, to see if you would like any of their samples and make

RE: [External] Re: Powerhouse Parramatta - Design Meeting Agenda

From: Eve Hoskins <eve.hoskins@arup.com>

To: Angelica GIANNOULATOU <angelica.giannoulatou@moreaukusunoki.com>

Cc: Hannah Slater <hannah.slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Nicolas Moreau <nicolas.moreau@moreaukusunoki.com>; hiroko kusunoki <hiroko.kusunoki@moreaukusunoki.com>; Leigh Woodley <leigh.woodley@genton.com.au>; Agnieszka PRUSIK <agnieszka.prusik@moreaukusunoki.com>; Steven Toia <steven.toia@genton.com.au>; Enrico Zara <enrico.zara@arup.com>; Jacob Wiest <jacob.wiest@arup.com>; Peter Romeos <peter.romeos@arup.com>; George Cunha <george.cunha@arup.com>; Enrico Zara <enrico.zara@arup.com>

Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 17:55:33 +1000

Attachments: image001_emz was removed from this message.msg.msg (54.78 kB)

Hi Angelica

Please find the summary responses to the comments in last week minutes below. Also is attached the sizes of the two facade structural options with the 2m wide glazing, with the indicative associated costs for the structural options.

https://arup-

my.sharepoint.com/±1p/eve hoskins/EUMXjeU2Wn9GisdOWKmdRhYBLAZhOPQ MpL7GSSrbPOADO

?e=WiJHPE

https://arup-

my.sharepoint.comttip/eve hoskins/EQ3xZykxL2pFtC2He1X4YzjOBJXXEIJAZUo6QExqMMljPg?

e=v)FE3h

Glazing system

o Reduce the number of mullions through adopting 2m panel glazing widths for curtain wall (3 per structural grid)

Possible to adopt 2m spacing (more difficult for installation and replacement but not impossible) - refer to sketchbook attached

Solid system

· Arup to complete research regarding solid GRC panels and advise:

o How to reduce the number of joints -

Refer to cementitious sketchbook - For curtain wall + hook on system - 2 x 5m as a maximum size (otherwise weight is too large to be lightweight construction and needs a crane to install).

Precast - try to reduce panel weights for installation in tight spaces. Recommend that maximum 2x5m panels are also adopted (larger is possible with increased depth but with increased risk of damage to exoskeleton)

o How big are the joints in the facade system?

d: +61 2 9320 9646
www.arup.com

Connect with Anip on Linkedln
Follow @ArupGroup

From: Angelica GIANNOULATOU <angelica.giannoulatou@moreaukusunoki.com>

Sent: Thursday, 30 April 2020 5:26 AM

To: Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Cc: Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; simon.walkom@maas.museum; Lisa Havilah <Lisa.Havilahmaas.museum>, Nicolas Moreau <nicolas.moreau@moreaukusunoki.com>; hiroko kusunoki <hiroko.kusunoki@moreaukusunoki.com>; Leigh Woodley <leigh.woodley@genton.com.au>; Agnieszka PRUSIK <agnieszka.prusik@moreaukusunoki.com>; Steven Toia <Steven.Toia@genton.com.au>; Enrico Zara <Enrico.Zara@arup.com>; Eric Rivers <Eric.Rivers@arup.com>; Eve Hoskins <Eve.Hoskins@arup.com>; Alexander Hespe <alexander.hespe@arup.com>; Alex Bowen <Alex.Bowen@maas.museum>; Chaya Bratoeva <chaya.bratoeva@maas.museum>; Lisa Ffrench <Lisa.Ffrench@maas.museum>; Hayley Coombes <Hayley.Coombes@maas.museum>; James Rongen-Hall <James.Ron en-1--glallariuseurn>; Haico Schepers <Haico.Schepers@arup.com>

Subject: [External] Re: Powerhouse Parramatta - Design Meeting Agenda

Hello all,

Please find a link to all the booklets we discussed today.
https://we.tl/t-LK9MrIX4hi

Cementitious Facade Panels

- Any feedback/markup from the Arup team is more than welcome, to help us understand the advantages or constraints of these different options.

- Initial approximate dimensions on the joints will also help us better test the visual impact.

- We will continue this study and do some tests with bigger panels (we understand that Arup will also provide a comparison for standard vs custom sized panels)

Exo-Facade Offset Impact

- We have added to the hybrid studies, to test the 0.75m offset

- We will follow up with some views to try and visualise the impact of the different options on the Civic Link.

Best regards,

Angelica GIANNOULATOU

MOREAU
KUSUNOKI
ARCHITECTES

5 rue de Nemours
75011 Paris France

T: 01 84 16 46 87

Le mer. 29 avr. 2020 a 06:00, Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au> a ecrit : Hi All,

Ahead of this evenings Design meeting please find the attached agenda to guide discussions. Please also find attached:

· SSDA Elevational markup

sure they are preparing something in line with your design.

https://arup-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/p/eve hoskins/EU9Nu-sg30tFsONVB82-
gbQBfzYFZ4MfJp1o2i7mXudSZg?e=S87ubY

https://arup-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/p/eve hoskins/EbaFxWvW7PNJuEp97TeZnIEBhR6u4-jJnzuAk--3LhO5ng?e=kTu7QY

1. Precast (your reference to steel reinforced panels) — You have mentioned load bearing and non-loadbearing façade precast panels. We have discussed load bearing panels previously with structures but as it does not benefit their structural system., we have not explored this further. You have also mentioned precast sandwich panels which include a layer of insulation to the panel itself. We should note that the insulation that is required in these panels is not compliant with current BCA with regards to non-combustibility and will require a fire engineered solution to go down this route.

3. Hook on GRC panels (Stick system)

It is our understanding that the Powerhouse prefers the 2m spacings of the façade modulation. We note that while we would prefer 1.5m modulation for ease of installation, it is not impossible and we can engineering custom lightweight GRC panels to suit, with stiffeners in high wind areas.

Note that for the 2m spacing the same T section (or box section) can be used for structural support of the glazed façade as there is a reduction factor for the support of these larger panels. This bespoke T section (or box section) can be replaced with an off the shelf section in the Solid wall areas where the structure will need to be covered with internal linings.

With regards to the gap of the cementitious façade in response to the seismic structural movements, we will hopefully be able to get you a rough indication of this tomorrow. This is very dependent on structural movements and façade supports so will be a rough estimate until there is a more final structural movements report.

Kind Regards,

Eve Hoskins

Engineer I Façade Engineering

BEHons / BDesArch

Arup

Barrack Place 151 Clarence Street Sydney NSW 2000

Eve Hoskins

Engineer I Facade Engineering

BEI-Ions I BI)esArch

Amp

Barrack Place 151 Clarence Street Sydney NSW 2000

d: +61 2 9320 9646

www.arup.com

Connect with Amp on Linkedln
Follow @ArupGroup

From: Angelica GIANNOULATOU <angelica.giannoulatou@moreaukusunoki.com>

Sent: Monday, 4 May 2020 10:18 PM

To: Eve Hoskins <Eve.Hoskins@arup.com>

Cc: Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Nicolas Moreau <nicolas.moreau@moreaukusunoki.com>; hiroko kusunoki <hiroko.kusunoki@moreaukusunoki.com>; Leigh Woodley <leigh.woodley@genton.com.au>; Agnieszka PRUSIK <agnieszka.prusik@moreaukusunoki.com>; Steven Toia <Steven.Toia@genton.com.au>; Enrico Zara <Enrico.Zara@arup.com>; Jacob Wiest <jacob.wiest@arup.com>; Peter Romeos <Peter.Romeos@arup.com>; George Cunha <George.Cunha@arup.com>

Subject: Re: [External] Re: Powerhouse Parramatta - Design Meeting Agenda

Thank you very much, Eve.

We will review your documents and take them into account in our studies.

We are also happy to discuss the samples tomorrow, so that we can provide some clarity on the

direction.

Best regards,

Angelica GIANNOULATOU

MOREAU
KUSUNOKI
ARCHITECTES

5 rue de Nemours
75011 Paris France

T : 01 84 16 46 87

Le lun. 4 mai 2020 a 09:44, Eve Hoskins <Eve.H IQ> a ecrit :
Hi Angelica (you emailed me just as I was emailing you),

Thanks for your booklet, That is useful to see the options that you are looking into.

Speaking to colleagues we are not familiar with an Australian supplier of the Hering internal products that you are showing in your booklet. We predict that these products will need to come from Germany. Australia has a relatively large market of Precast and GRC manufacturers so we have included these in the attached booklet. Suppliers we have been speaking to are: Precast concrete, Reider (Australian distributor is DCA Facades), Ascuro and Shapeshift. Some suppliers have offered to mock up samples based on the information I have given them on the quartz based look with lighter colour pigment to the concrete. Maybe we can discuss this quickly tomorrow, to see if you would like any of their samples and make

RE: [External] Re: Powerhouse Parramatta - Design Meeting Agenda

From: Eve Hoskins <eve.hoskins@arup.com>

To: Angelica GIANNOULATOU <angelica.giannoulatou@moreaukusunoki.com>

Cc: Hannah Slater <hannah.slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Nicolas Moreau <nicolas.moreau@moreaukusunoki.com>; hiroko kusunoki <hiroko.kusunoki@moreaukusunoki.com>; Leigh Woodley <leigh.woodley@genton.com.au>; Agnieszka PRUSIK <agnieszka.prusik@moreaukusunoki.com>, Steven Toia <steven.toia@genton.com.au>; Enrico Zara <enrico.zara@arup.com>; Jacob Wiest <jacob.wiest@arup.com>; Peter Romeos <peter.romeos@arup.com>; George Cunha <george.cunha@arup.com>; Enrico Zara <enrico.zara@arup.com>

Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 17:55:33 +1000

Attachments: image001_emz was removed from this message.msg.msg (54.78 kB)

Hi Angelica

https://arup-

my.sharepoint.comttip/eve hoskins/EUMXjeU2Wn9GisdOWKmdRhYBLAZhOPQ MpL 7GSSrbPOADQ

?e= WiJHPE

https://arup-

my.sharepoint.comtb:/p/eve hoskins/EQ3xZykxL2pF0He9X4YzjOBJXXEIJAZUo6QExqMMIjPg?

e=vjFE3h

Glazing system

® Reduce the number of mullions through adopting 2m panel glazing widths for curtain wall (3 per structural grid)

Possible to adopt 2m spacing (more difficult for installation and replacement but not impossible) - refer to sketchbook attached

Solid system

· Arup to complete research regarding solid GRC panels and advise:

o How to reduce the number of joints —

Refer to cementitious sketchbook - For curtain wall + hook on system - 2 x 5m as a maximum size (otherwise weight is too large to be lightweight construction and needs a crane to install).

m How big are the joints in the facade system?

Text Box: Text Box: · I
I ri
A 1111 L Thanks,
Hannah

From: Lisa Havilah <Lisa„Havilah@maas,rnuseum>

Sent: Friday, 1 May 2020 2:07 PM

To: Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater©infrastructure.nsv_Lgoy.au>

Cc: Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Simon Walkom <simon,walkom@maas.museum>; Lisa Ffrench <Lisa.Ffrenchemaas.museum>

Subject: ARUP + MK testing of facade

Hi Hannah,

When you have a second can you check [if we need to check] the heat/conditioning load that will come from the PS1 glass doors that are facing north....

Also do we have any update on the doors width/height further development from the initial presentation?

Thanks Lisa

Lisa Havilah

Chief Executive

Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences

500 Harris Street, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW 2007 Australia

T +61 2 92170363 M 0400 395 026

MAAS acknowledges Australia's First Nations Peoples as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the land and gives respect to the Elders — past and present — and through them to all Aboriginal and Tones Strait Islander peoples.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby not.ifed that any drscbsure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of thin information is stretty prohibited and may be unlawful.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby natured that any disclosure, copying, citribution or tal,ng action in relation of the contorts of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Electronic mail messages entering and leaving Arup business systems are scanned for viruses and acceptability of content.

RE: FW: ARUP + MK testing of facade

From: Enrico Zara <enrico.zara@arup.com>

To: Hannah Slater <hannah.slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Cc: Alexander Hespe <alexander.hespe@arup.com>

Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 15:58:56 +1000

· • •
Thanks I lannah,

PSI with an extensive tninsparentitranslucent facade facing north will he hard for both air-conditioning and daylight control.

You mark-up was definitely manageable. but a 20 in high transparent /translucent facade will be a sienificant design challenge. especially if there is a need to achieve a black box. Feedback from Powerhouse team will be Important to help this.

Thanks
Enrico

Enrico Zara

Associate j Design Manager

^-61 468 671 877

From: Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2020 3:46 PM

To: Enrico Zara <Enrico.Zara@arup.com>; Alexander Hespe <alexander.hespe@arup.com>

Subject: [External] FW: FW: ARUP + MK testing of facade

Hi Enrico and Alex,
Please see attached.

Thanks,
Hannah

From: Angelica GIANNOULATOU <angelic,a.giannoulatoq@moreaukusunoki.com>

Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2020 3:18 AM

To: Hannah Slater <Hannah.SlaterOinfrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Cc: Agnieszka PRUSIK <a_gnieszka.prusik@moreaukusmokis,o_m>; Leigh Woodley <leigh_woodley@genton.corn_au.>; Steven Toia <5.1even.Toia@genton.com,au>; Simon

Pagett <simon„pagelt@infrastructure,nsw.goy_a_tp; Hiroko KUSUNOKI <hiroko.kusunoki@moreaukusunoki.com>; Nicolas MOREAU

<nicolas,rnoreav@rnoreau_kuaunoki.conp; Nicholas MOROF <nicholamorof@mor.eaulsus.unoki.com>

Subject: Re: FW: ARUP + MK testing of facade

Hello Hannah,

The intention for the upper part of the PS1 doors was to keep it at least translucent, and not divide the height into glazing/solid, to keep the appearance as consistent as possible. As shown on the elevation set we shared with you last week (here shared again for reference), we have assumed clear glazing for the lower part and fritted glass for the upper part, treating it in a similar way as other levels. The 3D views (in the megadoor booklet) had been done before the exchange on the facade systems with Arup, but on visuals from now on we will show the updated assumptions.

It would be good to discuss tomorrow what feedback Arup gave you on the approach and comfort of the North and East Facades, so we can update our elevations before Wednesday, if needed.

As I mentioned on the call today, the PS1 doors are still under development, DEP and Arup exchanged at the end of last week, and they will be working on options

for treating and integrating the structure.

Jean Marc Teissier from DEP has confirmed he can join the meeting on Monday 11 May, so we can discuss any updates that may happen this week.

Thank you,

Ange5ca GIANNOULATOU

MOREAU

KUSUNOKI
ARCHITECTES

5 rue de Nemours
75911 Paris France

T: 0184164557

Le lun. 4 mai 2020 a 00:18, Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure nsw.qov.au> a kilt :
Hi Angelica and Aga,

On some of the 3D views the PS1 spaces above the doors are still being shown as transparent.
Could you please update these as per the elevation markup (below).

Could you also please send through any development work on the North and South PS doors particularly regarding the size following the direction to proceed

with the vertical hoisting?

In order for them to hoist upwards and conceal neatly behind the solid head over what is the height and structural requirement?

RE: PP - Safety review

From: Enrico Zara <enrico.zara@arup.com>

To: Hannah Slater <hannah.slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Cc: Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>; Peter Macdonald <peter.macdonald@arup.com>

Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 15:15:03 +1000

Hi Hannah,

I have discussed with Peter and we would suggest to have a third party providing this service. We do include safety in our design and to do SID reviews, however this specific design would probably need an independent review.

thanks
Enrico

Enrico Zara

Associate I Design Manager

M: +61 468 671 877

From: Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2020 1:58 PM

To: Enrico Zara <Enrico.Zara@arup.com>

Cc: Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Subject: [External] PP - Safety review

Hi Enrico,

Following our exoskeleton workshop last week there are a number of items which we would like a safety review on to inform the further design development (i.e. the design of the base to the exoskeleton/ balconies to avoid climbability). Could you please advise if there is someone at Arup who has the expertise to complete a review and provide advice in this area?

Thanks

Hannah Slater

Al Senior Development Manager

P 02 9216 5770

E hannah.slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au I www.insw.com

Level 12, MLC Centre, 19 Martin Race, Sydney NSW 2000

•

Ins

w Infrastructure
VT New South Wales

Ql acknoWedge and pay my respects to the traditional ovdleis and custodians on Mose land I yolk, viork and live.

RE: PP - Safety review

WitlY=TERT2M3 ^a

From: Enrico Enrico Zara <enrico.zara@arup.com>

To: Hannah Slater <hannah.slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 14:41:07 +1000

Let me check and I will get back to you
Enrico

Enrico Zara

Associate I Design Manager

M: +61 468 671 877

From: Hannah Slater <Hannah.Slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Sent: Tuesday, 5 May 2020 1:58 PM

To: Enrico Zara <Enrico.Zara@arup.com>

Cc: Simon Pagett <simon.pagett@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au>

Subject: [External] PP - Safety review

Hi Enrico,

Thanks

Hannah Slater

(5,1 Senior Development Manager

P 02 9216 5770

E hannah.slater@infrastructure.nsw.gov.au www.insw.com

Level 12, MLC Centre, 19 Martin Place, Sydney NSW 2000

■

INSWINnerwraSsotutiftairees

acknoviedge and pay my respects to the traditional owners and custodians on Nose land I viatk, viork and live.

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it.. If you are not the recipient,^-you are^-hereby^-notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Electronic mail messages entering and leaving Arup business systems are scanned for viruses and

% Complete Done/Overdue?

Text Box: 50% Ito
C" - t.. 100% -i
E.:7 E,..._,. 100% i ,,f
FT 100% V
1
.

F.^--- . ........_ r---IL:	100% !,,
u-J J	50% p•
	50% :.
	50% r

75% p. Overdue

75%

100% IV Done

· 100% ^j JDone

100% I d Done

100% I te Done

100% i J Done

/7^-

100% Done

100% J Done

Fri _ 100%1:4⁰ Done

Overdue

Text Box: C. I 50% P. Overdue

100% IV Done
75%

50% 1. Overdue

50% ?" Overdue

rso,-

FT' 100% t Overdue
rr^-

100°loJJ Done

100% ad i)Dne

Powerhouse Parra matte

	Category_. ,	Dosdription	Priority	Responsibility	Status		DatoRal
Complete						24;03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24;03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24;03/2020
In Progress						24/03/2020		24/03/2020
In Progress						24;03/2020		24;03/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24103/2020
Complete						24/03/2020		24/03/2020

Powerhouse Parramatta

NSW.001.023.2976_015

% Complete Done/Overdue?

0% r' Overdue

0% t Overdue

0% it*^- Overdue

0% ;a. Overdue

0% I. Overdue

0% Overdue

0% ► Overdue

0% 1' Overdue

0% I. Overdue

0% Overdue

0% Overdue
0%

0% Overdue

0% .> Overdue

0% Overdue

0% :,•• Overdue

0% ;⁷' Overdue

0% fo- Overdue

0% I. Overdue

Powerhouse Parraniatta

Responsibility

;Due Date

Category

Priority

Date 1:tati?.(34:1

Description

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Not Started

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

In Progress

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

24;03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

In Progress

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

Complete

24;03/2020

In Progress

24/03/2020

Complete

24;03/2020

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

In Progress

24103/2020

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

In Progress

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

Complete

24/03/2020

In Progress

24/03/2020

In Progress

24/03/2020

In Progress

24/03/2020

Powerhouse Parramatta

NSW.001.023.2976_012

EMT= DonelOverdue?

0% r" Overdue

0% :¹' Overdue

0% i. Overdue

0% :¹" Overdue

0% Overdue

0% r^ Overdue

0% r" Overdue

0% Overdue

0% ?" Overdue

0% r" Overdue

0% r° Overdue

0% s Overdue

0% ?" Overdue

0% Overdue

0% r" Overdue

0% 1. Overdue

0% Overdue

0% r" Overdue

0% I Overdue

0% r" Overdue

0% Overdue
0% >Overdue

0% Overdue

0% s Overdue

0% Overdue

0% r° Overdue

0% T Overdue

0% 1. Overdue

0% Overdue

0% r" Overdue

0% I' Overdue

Powerhouse Parramatta

Task/issue	Category	Description	Priority	Responsibility	Status	Date Raised	Due Date
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24;o3i2o2o
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020
					Not Started	24/03/2020	24/03/2020